There are several events in the history of research ethics that have had an impact on how we think about the ethical conduct of research in the 21st century. Amongst these will be the Nuremberg Trials and subsequent Nuremberg Code … Continue reading →
Tagged freely given informed consent, research ethics, research ethics committee, Tuskegee |
In order to maintain acceptable standards of ethical practice, all professional disciplines have developed and published guidelines or codes for their practitioners. For example, nurses are guided by the Nursing and Midwifery Council’s ‘The Code’ and doctors are guided by … Continue reading →
Tagged codes of practice, Declaration of Helsinki, Henrietta Lacks, Henry Beecher, history, Maurice Pappworth, Milgram, Nuremberg Code, research ethics, Tuskegee |
In last week’s blog, the first of four in this series, I introduced the idea that decision making by Research Ethics Committees (RECs) is predominantly influenced by four considerations; the need for freely given informed consent, the risk to research … Continue reading →
Tagged clinical research, clinical trials, decision making, harm, REC, research ethics, research ethics committee, risk |
Much has been written about decision making by Research Ethics Committees (RECs) and factors that most influence how RECs reach an opinion on an application for research ethics approval. Decision making has been linked to focusing on the underpinning ethical … Continue reading →
Tagged coercion, decision making, freely given informed consent, information sheet, participant information sheet, REC, research ethics, research ethics committee |
Apr 26, 2019 in Ethics, History of research ethics, informed consent, Recruitment and retention, Research, Research ethics, Research ethics committee, Tuskegee Syphilis Study